9-11 Inside Job

World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 & 7

Fell on Footprint in Free Fall Time (as if with no resistance)


Best Articles & Videos

Top 9-11 & Hacking Election
Articles & Videos

9-11 What You Are Not Being Told Videos

Videos Re: Secret Government

WTC 7 Website

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

Report: Magnet and PDA Sufficient to Change Votes on Voting  Machines

Al-qaeda Is Creation of Bushites and Mass Media

Good 9-11 Truth Video
What Top Players Say about 9-11
The Category of Terror

9/11: Re-examining the 3 WTC High-rise Building "Collapses"
NIST Admits Total Collapse of Twin Towers is Unexplainable
Dr. David Ray Griffin Interview in Copenhagen
New Eyewitnesses to WTC Basement Explosions
Full Movie: How Indeed Did The Twin Towers Collapse?
Barry Jennings Was Witness to WTC 7 Controlled Demo
Patriots Question 9-11 Website
Did Flight 93 Crash in Shanksville, Pa.?
NYC Emergency Service Director-WTC 7 Was Controlled Demo
Hunt Boeing-Shanksville Edition
9-11 Case against Cheney
Analyst: al-Qaeda Tapes Doctored by US Company
WTC 7 Security Official Details Explosions in WTC 7
WTC 7 Set Up for Controlled Demolition for Morning of 9-11
Cheney Was in Command of NORAD on 9-11 Video
Mineta Confirms Cheney Ordered 9-11 Stand-Down
9-11 NIST Report Debunked
9-11 Asbestos Contamination-A Website to Help You
9-11 CNN and Fox Live Video Coverage
Rumsfeld on 9-11: An Enemy Within
9-11 Must Watch Truth Videos
WTC Slow Motion Video-Floors Being Blown Out
Mark Crispin Miller-No to Holt Bill Video
Theft of 2004 Election-What You Must Believe
Jim Fetzer on Hannity & Colmes Re: 9-11 Video
Cutter Charges Confirmed at WTC
NIST Confronted over 9-11
WTC Controlled Demolitions-Video
Bush Told of 9-11 Attack Before He Left Florida Hotel
Many Explosions in WTC
Rare WTC 7 Video-Limited Fires
FBI-No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9-11
Open Complicity-Anatomy of 9-11 Cover-Up Video
Professor Jones 10 Part 9-11 Truth Video
CNN Reports Complete Disinfo on 9-11 Video
9-11 and the Evidence
USAF Stand Down on 9-11
Third Stage- Very Good Short 9-11 Truth Video
9-11 Video: WTC Loaded with Explosives
9/11 'Smoking Guns'
9/11 Report: A 571-Page Lie
9-11 Growing Skepticism
Pentagon Official Story is False-Video
WTC 7 The Smoking Gun of 9-11 Video
Flight 93 Crash Site Video-No Plane
Alex Jones-9-11 Holes Video
Webmaster Talks on 9-11 
Morgan Reynolds Talk on 9-11

  • Expert on Record-Bin Laden Confession a Fake
    CNN Live Report- No Airplane at Pentagon
    Mineta Testimony on Cheney Stand Down/shoot Down Censored

  • U.S. Army Troops To Serve As U.S. Policemen?
    U.S. Army Troops To Serve As U.S. Policemen?
    By Chuck Baldwin
    October 1, 2008

    This column is archived at

    According to the Army Times (dated Tuesday, September 30, 2008), "Beginning
    Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT [Brigade Combat Team] will be under the
    day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of
    Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or
    manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks."

    The article continued by saying, "But this new mission marks the first time
    an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint
    command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal
    homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil

    "After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that
    another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the
    mission will be a permanent one."

    The Times column also reported that the Army brigade "may be called upon to
    help with civil unrest and crowd control . . ." It seems that the Army's new
    domestic duties also include "traffic control" as well as subduing "unruly
    or dangerous individuals."

    The brigade will be known for the next year as a Consequence Management
    Response Force, or CCMRF (pronounced "sea-smurf").

    I am assuming that the planners and promoters of this newfound function for
    the Army brigade envision the Army assisting local first responders in
    dealing with natural emergencies such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and the
    like. Good intentions notwithstanding, to assign domestic police duties to
    the U.S. military is extremely disturbing.

    To understand my concern for this new "homeland Army brigade," it is
    important that we rehearse the principles of liberty as they relate to
    standing armies.

    One of America's most sacred principles has always been that the U.S.
    military was never to be used for domestic law enforcement. The fear of
    standing armies ran very deep in the hearts and minds of America's founders.
    The tyranny and misery inflicted upon the colonies by British troops weighed
    heavily upon those who drafted our Constitution and Bill of Rights. In their
    minds, the American people would never again be subjected to the heavy
    weight of army boots. Furthermore, they insisted that America would have a
    civilian--not military--government.

    And after the fiasco of the abuse of federal troops in the South following
    the War Between the States, the doctrine of Posse Comitatus was enacted into
    law. The Wikipedia online encyclopedia says this about Posse Comitatus:

    "The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services ... from
    exercising nominally state law enforcement police or peace officer powers
    that maintain 'law and order' on non-federal property. . . .

    "The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the
    United States National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law
    enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly
    authorized by the Constitution or Congress. . . .

    "The Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act substantially limit the
    powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement."

    The Posse Comitatus Act was passed in 1878 and was universally accepted as
    being a very just--and extremely important--law of the land.

    But in 2006, President George W. Bush pushed a Republican-controlled
    Congress to pass the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
    Fiscal Year 2007, which included a section titled "Use of the Armed Forces
    in major public emergencies." This section provided that "The President may
    employ the armed forces to restore public order in any State of the United
    States the President determines...." In effect, this bill obliterated Posse

    When the Democrat-controlled Congress passed the 2008 National Defense
    Authorization Act, however, the restrictions of Posse Comitatus were
    restored. But when President Bush signed the Act into law, he attached a
    signing statement (Executive Order) indicating that the Executive Branch did
    not feel bound by the changes enacted by the repeal. Translated: President
    Bush wiped out Posse Comitatus by Executive Order.

    Now, just a few months after expunging Posse Comitatus, President Bush has
    authorized an Army brigade to be assigned the new role of dealing
    exclusively with domestic law enforcement and related duties. This evokes
    serious questions.

    Who will give the order to send U.S. troops against American civilians, and
    under what circumstances? What will the rules of engagement be? How will
    "unruly" and "dangerous" be defined? How will soldiers be asked to deal with
    "crowd" or "traffic" control? And perhaps the biggest question is, Once we
    begin to go down this road, where will it lead?

    For several years, the federal government has been accumulating to itself
    more and more authority that was historically understood to reside within
    the states and local communities. More and more, our police departments have
    taken on the image and tactics of the armed forces. And to a greater and
    greater degree, the rights and liberties of the American people are being
    sacrificed on the altar of "national security." It seems to me that to now
    ascribe law enforcement duties to the U.S. Army only serves to augment the
    argument that America is fast approaching police state status.

    If Hurricane Katrina is the template that our federal government is using as
    a model for future events, Heaven help us! Do readers remember how National
    Guard troops were used to confiscate the personal firearms of isolated and
    vulnerable civilians shortly after that hurricane devastated the New Orleans
    area? Do you remember how representatives of the federal government were
    calling upon pastors and ministers to act as spokesmen for gun confiscation?
    Is this what the new Army brigade is preparing for? And do President Bush
    and his military planners envision an even broader role for military troops
    on American soil?

    Add to the above rumors of thousands of plastic caskets--along with
    thousands of portable prison cells--being shipped and stored across the
    country, and one is left to ask, Exactly what is it that our federal
    government is planning?

    I think there is an even bigger question, What exactly will members of our
    armed forces do if and when they are commanded to seize Americans' firearms,
    arrest them at gun point, or even fire upon them? How many soldiers and
    Marines love liberty and constitutional government enough to resist such
    orders, should they be given? And how many officers would resist issuing
    such orders?

    Remember, it is the job of the armed forces to kill people and blow up
    things, not to do police work. Then again, Presidential administrations from
    both major parties have been using the U.S. military as U.N. "peacekeepers"
    for decades now. So, was all of this preparation for what is yet to take
    place in the United States?

    God forbid that any of the above should actually take place in our beloved
    land, but I believe it would be naïve to not see that the actions and
    attitudes of the federal government over the past several years do nothing
    to assuage such fears.

    *If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these
    editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by
    credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:


    *Disclaimer: I am currently a candidate for President of the United States
    on the Constitution Party ticket. My official campaign web site is located