9-11 Inside Job

World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 & 7

Fell on Footprint in Free Fall Time (as if with no resistance)


Top 9-11 & Hacking Election Articles & Videos

9-11 What You Are Not Being Told Videos

Videos Re: Secret Government

WTC 7 Website

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

Report: Magnet and PDA Sufficient to Change Votes on Voting  Machines

Al-qaeda Is Creation of Bushites and Mass Media

Good 9-11 Truth Video

What Top Players Say about 9-11

The Category of Terror

9/11: Re-examining the 3 WTC High-rise Building "Collapses"

NIST Admits Total Collapse of Twin Towers is Unexplainable

Dr. David Ray Griffin Interview in Copenhagen

New Eyewitnesses to WTC Basement Explosions

Full Movie: How Indeed Did The Twin Towers Collapse?

Barry Jennings Was Witness to WTC 7 Controlled Demo

Patriots Question 9-11 Website

Did Flight 93 Crash in Shanksville, Pa.?

NYC Emergency Service Director-WTC 7 Was Controlled Demo

Hunt Boeing-Shanksville Edition

9-11 Case against Cheney

Analyst: al-Qaeda Tapes Doctored by US Company

WTC 7 Security Official Details Explosions in WTC 7

WTC 7 Set Up for Controlled Demolition for Morning of 9-11

Cheney Was in Command of NORAD on 9-11 Video

Mineta Confirms Cheney Ordered 9-11 Stand-Down

9-11 NIST Report Debunked

9-11 Asbestos Contamination-A Website to Help You

9-11 CNN and Fox Live Video Coverage

Rumsfeld on 9-11: An Enemy Within

9-11 Must Watch Truth Videos

WTC Slow Motion Video-Floors Being Blown Out

Mark Crispin Miller-No to Holt Bill Video

Theft of 2004 Election-What You Must Believe

Jim Fetzer on Hannity & Colmes Re: 9-11 Video

Cutter Charges Confirmed at WTC

NIST Confronted over 9-11

WTC Controlled Demolitions-Video

Bush Told of 9-11 Attack Before He Left Florida Hotel

Many Explosions in WTC

Rare WTC 7 Video-Limited Fires

FBI-No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9-11

Open Complicity-Anatomy of 9-11 Cover-Up Video

Professor Jones 10 Part 9-11 Truth Video

CNN Reports Complete Disinfo on 9-11 Video

9-11 and the Evidence

USAF Stand Down on 9-11

Third Stage- Very Good Short 9-11 Truth Video

9-11 Video: WTC Loaded with Explosives

9/11 'Smoking Guns'

9/11 Report: A 571-Page Lie

9-11 Growing Skepticism

Pentagon Official Story is False-Video

WTC 7 The Smoking Gun of 9-11 Video

Flight 93 Crash Site Video-No Plane

Alex Jones-9-11 Holes Video

Webmaster Talks on 9-11

Morgan Reynolds Talk on 9-11

  • Expert on Record-Bin Laden Confession a Fake
    CNN Live Report- No Airplane at Pentagon
    Mineta Testimony on Cheney Stand Down/shoot Down Censored

  • What Change?
    Stumble It! 
    What Change?
    By Chuck Baldwin
    December 5, 2008

    This column is archived at

    "Change you can believe in." This was Barack Obama's campaign slogan. There
    is no doubt that the American people were fed up with George W. Bush and his
    fellow Republicans. Who can blame them?

    After campaigning for change back in 1999 (What political challenger doesn't
    campaign for change?), President Bush and his fellow neocons promptly set
    out to continue business as usual in Washington, D.C. Federal spending and
    meddling exploded under the leadership of the GOP. In fact, one has to go
    back to the administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt to match the increases
    in Big Government and Big Brother by Bush and Company. Add to the
    out-of-control spending habits of the GOP an unnecessary war, a
    near-Depression economy, and a burgeoning police state. It is no surprise
    that the American people were ready for change. And Obama excelled in
    delivering the message of change. So, what kind of change will Obama
    actually deliver?

    Will Obama remove U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan? Probably not. Oh,
    he might reduce troops in Iraq, but if anyone believes that he will not
    leave a significant U.S. presence in Iraq, they are living in a dream world.
    Furthermore, many, if not most, of the troops from Iraq will most likely
    find themselves in Afghanistan. Mark my words; Barack Obama has no plans to
    remove U.S. troops from the Middle East. Net result: no change.

    What about America's economic woes? What changes will Barack Obama bring to
    the table? Hardly any. America will continue it's trademark deficit
    spending; we will continue to send manufacturing jobs overseas; so-called
    "free trade" deals will continue to advance; Big Business will continue to
    receive government bailouts; the Federal Reserve will continue to call the
    shots for America's financial decisions (and reap gargantuan profits in the
    process); Congress will continue to be inept, irresponsible, and clueless;
    there will be no attempt to return the United States to sound money
    principles; and there will be no reduction in foreign aid. In a nutshell, it
    will be business as usual in Washington, D.C., and New York City.

    Don't get me wrong: Barack Obama will doubtless throw out some bones to his
    liberal supporters in much the same way that Republican presidents throw out
    a bone or two to their conservative constituents. Watch for Obama to
    overturn the ban on embryonic stem cell research. America's upper income
    earners can expect some sort of tax increase. No doubt oil companies will
    end up losing some tax exemptions. Watch for additional environmentalist
    policies to be enacted. And, yes, there will be some sort of "universal
    health care" proposal. But the Bush administration has already given America
    a socialized financial system, so how can Republicans complain about
    socialized medicine?

    Obama might try to resurrect the "Fairness Doctrine." Some suggest that
    Obama might try to rid the prohibition of homosexuals serving in the armed
    forces, but I doubt that he will take on this one. The political net gain
    would not be worth the potential fallout.

    Although he might want to, I doubt that Obama will actively promote
    additional gun control (Democrats always lose when this happens). He may
    push for a ban on "high capacity" magazines that hold over ten rounds, as
    Bill Clinton did. If Obama does not go after guns directly, we can expect
    some sort of attack on ammunition (which is already happening) that will
    drive up the cost of ammo even more. Of course, some sort of gun
    confiscation or martial law could materialize in the wake of another
    "terrorist" attack. But a McCain administration would act no differently,
    so, again, the net result is zero change. Remember, it was Republican George
    W. Bush who expunged Posse Comitatus and deployed 20,000 army troops on U.S.
    soil to be used for domestic law enforcement. If Obama really wanted to
    bring about change, he would reverse Bush's draconian decisions, would he
    not? Don't hold your breath.

    We can also expect more harassment of gun owners and lawful gun dealers by
    the BATFE. But this is no change at all. The current leadership at BATFE is
    already about as hostile to gun owners and gun dealers as it can possibly
    be. An Obama BATFE will be no worse. But neither will it be any better. Net
    result: no change.

    So, what will be the overall change to the direction of America? Answer:
    there will be no change to the overall direction of the country. There will
    be no change to the welfare state. There will be little change to the
    warfare state. No change to NATO, except to expand it. Very little change,
    if any, to foreign policy. No change to America's open sieves, otherwise
    called national borders. And there will be absolutely no change to the
    burgeoning New World Order that began in earnest under both Bushes and Bill

    The NAFTA superhighway will have the support of the Obama administration.
    The North American Community will proceed unimpeded by the Obama White
    House. In all likelihood, the Amero (a common currency with Canada and
    Mexico) will materialize during Obama's first term. But this would all have
    happened had John McCain been elected. No change here.

    One reason why it is so easy to predict a business-as-usual Obama Presidency
    is the people that Obama has surrounded himself with. Former New York
    Federal Reserve chairman Timothy Geithner* for Secretary of the Treasury;
    former Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers* for National Economic
    Council director; Bush's Defense Secretary Robert Gates* will keep his job;
    Illinois Representative Rahm Emanuel for Obama's Chief of Staff; Hillary
    Clinton for Secretary of State; Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano* for
    Secretary of Homeland Security; former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle* to
    head the Health and Human Services Department; former Assistant Attorney
    General Eric Holder to be Attorney General; New Mexico Governor Bill
    Richardson* as Secretary of Commerce; Susan Rice* for U.S. Ambassador to the
    United Nations; Paul Volcker* for the Economic Recovery Advisory Board;
    James Steinberg* as Deputy Secretary of State; Mona Sutphen* for Deputy
    White House Chief of Staff, and Louis Caldera* for Director of the White
    House Military Office.

    Does anyone see "change" with the above names? Every one of them is a
    longtime political insider. And at least eleven of them (those with an
    asterisk [*] behind their names, above) are members of the globalist Council
    on Foreign Relations (CFR). In fact, six out of the eleven cabinet-level
    positions in the Obama administration are CFR members.

    The CFR has dominated both Democrat and Republican Presidential
    administrations for decades. Presidents such as Dwight Eisenhower, Richard
    Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton have all
    been members of the CFR. Vice Presidents such as Hubert Humphrey, Nelson
    Rockefeller, Walter Mondale, and Dick Cheney have been CFR members. And over
    the last several decades, practically every secretary of defense, secretary
    of the treasury, and most CIA directors have been CFR members. And let's not
    forget that this year's Republican Presidential nominee, John McCain, is a
    CFR member.

    Do you now see why--no matter who is elected President of the United
    States--nothing changes? Republican or Democrat, it does not matter: the CFR
    and their collaborators remain in power. And as Sonny and Cher used to sing,
    "The Beat Goes On."

    There will be no real change in Washington, D.C., until the CFR and their
    elitist cronies are thoroughly and universally removed from power. And the
    only way this will happen is if we elect an Independent President of the
    United States (someone who truly understands the New World Order and is
    dedicated to defeating it), because the two major parties will never allow
    someone opposed to the CFR to become their nominee. The only Republican
    candidate for President in 2008 who demonstrated those credentials was Dr.
    Ron Paul. And to a lesser degree, the only Democrat who even seemed to
    vaguely understand this was Dennis Kucinich. Notice that both men were
    thoroughly repudiated by their respective parties' leadership and all but
    totally ignored by the national news media. (The CFR and their surrogates
    also control the national news media. What a coincidence!)

    So, while the occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue may have changed, there
    will be no real change to the direction of these United States. Count on it!

    (c) Chuck Baldwin


    Readers may also respond to this column via snail mail. The postal address
    is P.O. Box 37070, Pensacola, Florida. When responding, please include your
    name, city and state. And, unless otherwise requested, all respondents will
    be added to the Chuck Wagon address list.

    Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com