9-11 Inside Job

World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 & 7

Fell on Footprint in Free Fall Time (as if with no resistance)


Top 9-11 & Hacking Election Articles & Videos

9-11 What You Are Not Being Told Videos

Videos Re: Secret Government

WTC 7 Website

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

Report: Magnet and PDA Sufficient to Change Votes on Voting  Machines

Al-qaeda Is Creation of Bushites and Mass Media

Good 9-11 Truth Video

What Top Players Say about 9-11

The Category of Terror

9/11: Re-examining the 3 WTC High-rise Building "Collapses"

NIST Admits Total Collapse of Twin Towers is Unexplainable

Dr. David Ray Griffin Interview in Copenhagen

New Eyewitnesses to WTC Basement Explosions

Full Movie: How Indeed Did The Twin Towers Collapse?

Barry Jennings Was Witness to WTC 7 Controlled Demo

Patriots Question 9-11 Website

Did Flight 93 Crash in Shanksville, Pa.?

NYC Emergency Service Director-WTC 7 Was Controlled Demo

Hunt Boeing-Shanksville Edition

9-11 Case against Cheney

Analyst: al-Qaeda Tapes Doctored by US Company

WTC 7 Security Official Details Explosions in WTC 7

WTC 7 Set Up for Controlled Demolition for Morning of 9-11

Cheney Was in Command of NORAD on 9-11 Video

Mineta Confirms Cheney Ordered 9-11 Stand-Down

9-11 NIST Report Debunked

9-11 Asbestos Contamination-A Website to Help You

9-11 CNN and Fox Live Video Coverage

Rumsfeld on 9-11: An Enemy Within

9-11 Must Watch Truth Videos

WTC Slow Motion Video-Floors Being Blown Out

Mark Crispin Miller-No to Holt Bill Video

Theft of 2004 Election-What You Must Believe

Jim Fetzer on Hannity & Colmes Re: 9-11 Video

Cutter Charges Confirmed at WTC

NIST Confronted over 9-11

WTC Controlled Demolitions-Video

Bush Told of 9-11 Attack Before He Left Florida Hotel

Many Explosions in WTC

Rare WTC 7 Video-Limited Fires

FBI-No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9-11

Open Complicity-Anatomy of 9-11 Cover-Up Video

Professor Jones 10 Part 9-11 Truth Video

CNN Reports Complete Disinfo on 9-11 Video

9-11 and the Evidence

USAF Stand Down on 9-11

Third Stage- Very Good Short 9-11 Truth Video

9-11 Video: WTC Loaded with Explosives

9/11 'Smoking Guns'

9/11 Report: A 571-Page Lie

9-11 Growing Skepticism

Pentagon Official Story is False-Video

WTC 7 The Smoking Gun of 9-11 Video

Flight 93 Crash Site Video-No Plane

Alex Jones-9-11 Holes Video

Webmaster Talks on 9-11

Morgan Reynolds Talk on 9-11

  • Expert on Record-Bin Laden Confession a Fake
    CNN Live Report- No Airplane at Pentagon
    Mineta Testimony on Cheney Stand Down/shoot Down Censored

  • 9-11: Case Not Closed Yet

  • 9-11 Mock Trial-Wing TV
    9-11 Research Website Links

  • 9-11 Mystery Movie

  • Loose Change-Final Cut

  • Underlying Politics of 9-11 (Part I)

  • Underlying Politics of 9/11 (Part II)

  • The Category of Terror

  • Webster Tarpley’s Talk on 9-11

  • The 9/11 Commission Report was a Fraud

  • Why Did WTC Collapse?

  • Comments on the Pentagon Strike

  • Hacking Democracy (HBO Special)

  • Diebold Whistleblower Video

  • Video Showing Ease of Hacking Diebold Machine

  • Liberals Willing to Trade Blood and Treasure for Oil Company Profits Under Obama
    Liberals Willing to Trade Blood and Treasure for Oil Company Profits Under Obama

    Eric Blair
    Activist Post

    It's perplexing to see a high level of support for the unprovoked bombing of Libya on so-called "progressive" websites.

    There has been an endless stream of humanitarian propaganda flowing from these sites trying to convince average liberals that the "human thing to do" is to rain down tomahawk missiles with depleted uranium to bring freedom and democracy to an oppressed people.

    Huffington Post ran a piece by Ed Schultz titled Why I Support President Obama's Decision to Invade Libya where he described his reasoning as follows:
    ...President Obama explained this won't be a long-term operation.
    Matter of days, not a matter of weeks. Not even months.
    ...He's (Obama) trying to give the rebels, those who want democracy, a fighting chance at just that and trying to stop Gaddafi -- this is the human thing to do -- from slaughtering his own people.

    By the very use of the word "invade" in the title, Schultz would seem to understand that the continued military support is likely to last for quite some time. Indeed, this was confirmed on Sunday morning when Defense Secretary Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hinted that the operation could indeed last for months, which seems to debunk Schultz's main argument that it's only a days-long conflict. This justification is reminiscent of Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld falsely stating that the Iraq war would be quick and easy -- only cost a couple of a billion dollars that would be paid for by Iraqi oil.

    Additionally, Schultz and others making the "humanitarian" argument that we needed to prevent Gaddafi from slaughtering his own people is convoluted at best, if not a blatant hypocritical contradiction. It has become clear that the United States and their imperial partners, Britain and France, are picking and choosing which civil uprisings and which dictators to support with no genuine concern for democracy or civil rights.

    Everyone with an objective view knows by now that this intervention is about protecting oil resources and making sure Israel survives these revolutionary times in the Arab world. Whether it's control over Egypt's Suez Canal, Libya's sweet crude, or propping up the tyrannical Saudi regime in the face of protesters there, this selective military action in Libya seems to be exactly what liberals screamed about during Bush's preemptive oil wars.

    In an informative article this weekend, Mike Rozeff wrote about the pre-Bush history of the same plans for the oil-rich Arab world:

    A RAND document reviews the U.S. oil policy in the mid-East and associated regions. It points out (p. 60) that President Carter enunciated this policy on January 23, 1980 in his State of the Union Address:

    'Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.'
    Even before this, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff in September of 1978 issued a strategy assessment in which it wrote of 'continuous access to petroleum resources' as priority #1 in the region, along with seeing that Israel survived. In 1979, the military put together a 'Rapid Deployment Force (RDF), which soon gained full, unified command status as the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM).'

    Rozeff makes a compelling argument why the United States will spare no expense to ensure the control of oil in the Arab world no matter what the consequences may be:
    Hence, there is no question that the U.S. considers the uninterrupted oil flow from this region as a vital interest. The U.S. has made war over Kuwait in 1990, in Iraq in this century, and now in Libya. It has gone into related areas such as Somalia, Yemen, and Afghanistan. It has confronted Iran for decades. It has armed and aided all sorts of dictatorial regimes in the region.

    The U.S. government has done all of these things under the doctrine that oil flows must not be interrupted. It has acted strongly even when such an interruption was a remote prospect. It acted under false pretexts in Iraq. It has imposed sanctions on Iran. It has threatened war on Iran over its nuclear activities on more than one occasion.

    The U.S. is acting now in Libya. Although Libya poses little risk of interrupting U.S. oil supplies, the U.S. wants to control the outcome in Libya. The U.S. must demonstrate control if it is to maintain control in neighboring regions such as Saudi Arabia where revolts, possible revolts, and revolutions are likely.

    It may be even worse than Rozeff reports, as it seems more appropriate to say that U.S./NATO are doing the dirty work for the multinational oil companies rather than "national interests." It's clear that these borderless companies are the ones who benefit from the drilling contracts when the military dust-ups settle. For example, the UK people didn't exactly benefit from BP's massive drilling contracts in Iraq that also earned ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair handsome consulting kickbacks.

    Furthermore, the average price for oil prior to America's undeclared wars between 2001-2002 was less than $23 per barrel. After America invaded Iraq, the price of oil skyrocketed relatively quickly to peak at $147 in 2008, leaving some to speculate that this spike in society's life-blood was the real trigger for the economic collapse in the fall of that same year. Regardless, it is obvious that a 500% increase in oil price in just five short years was not exactly protecting the "vital interests" of the American people who endured the brunt of the fuel increases, the subsequent bailout of the global economy, while also paying for the war tab.

    Now, Huffington Post and others are trying to justify this expensive and unconstitutional new war front, while at the same time slamming domestic spending cuts brought on by deficits primarily caused by bloated and unnecessary defense/war/surveillance spending. In the name of humanitarian intervention, these so-called progressives have become no different than the war-mongering Neocons they so despised. Perhaps their stunning hypocrisy makes them even worse than Neocons. Regardless, what's clear is that they all serve the same masters for the same end result no matter what labels or excuses are given.

    However, it's encouraging that the general progressive public don't seem to be buying into the establishment-liberal support for the new "invasion". Judging by the 1400-plus comments responding to Schultz's article, about 90% of them are challenging Schultz, and those who support his position are universally panned by other commenters. After all, the hypocrisy of this preemptive military strike is so blatant -- the lack of Congressional approval makes it clearly illegal -- and the cost of more foreign intervention during rabid spending-cut debates at home proves where their alliances truly stand.

    Establishment progressives can no longer hide behind phony labels. They have officially joined the ranks of the War Party serving up American blood and treasure to support profits for the military-industrial complex and Big Oil, while compromising on austerity cuts at home.


    Google Translation

    If Languages do not appear in  boxes, put cursor over box

    Deutsch Espanol Francais Italiano Portugues Russian Arabic Japanese Korean Simplified Chinese Learn More  

    Welcome to those Readers
    outside of the U.S.. Please
    use the Google Application above.
    only search This Site

    Featured Articles & Videos

    Interview with Naomi Wolf author of "Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries"

    Zeitgeist Movie-New Version-Monetary System Exposed

    Top Archived Articles and Videos

    Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

    Evolution of Evil-Plutocracy Controls Politics

    How Israel Duped U.S. into Fighting their Wars

    Bush's Martial Law Plan-He Will Not Show to Congress   

    Why Dems Will Not Impeach-by Joe, Webmaster

    History of Money-What Banks Don't Want You to Know

    Dual Citizenship-Loyal to Whom

    Who Is Congress Listening To? Not Us. Then Who?

    Coming Fiscal Doom

    Bush Family Connection to JFK Assasination-Must

    Creeping Fascism: From Nazi Germany to Post 9-11 USA

    Al-qaeda Is Creation of Bushites and Mass Media

    9-11 Truth Manifesto-Article V Constitutional Convention

    9-11, Iraq, PNAC-All Roads Lead to Israel

    Impending Destruction of US Economy

    Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

    Mega Lie-War on Terror

    10 Films the US Government Would Rather You Not See

    All Roads Lead to Dick Cheney

    Averting WWIII-Ending Dollar Hegemony and Imperialism

    Neocons Use of False Narratives

    Why Dems Took Impeachment of Cheney Off Table

    AIPAC'S Power Base

    Rapture Ready Video: Christians United for Israel

    End of America-Talk by Naomi Wolf

    Federal Reserve Bank Scam Video-Easily Understood

    Money Masters-Part 1

    Money Masters-Part 2

    Depleted Uranium Atrocity Video

    Iran President on Holocaust-Video

    Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change Video

    Essential Films on Globalization

    Scott Ritter-Middle East Abyss-Videos

    Bush Knew Sadam Had No WMD's

    Lie of Century-All Wars Are Based on Deception

    The Biggest Scam in History

    Israeli Neocon Connection Video

    Open Complicity-Anatomy of 9-11 Cover-Up Video-MUST WATCH

    Israeli Lobby-Portrait of a Great Taboo-Video

    Top Federal Reserve Bank Scam Articles and Videos


    Bill Moyers' Talk on Media Reform-Part 1