The Truth will prevail, but only if we demand it from Congress!

9-11 Inside Job and Neocons Hacked 2004


Home ] 9-11 Inside Job ] Federal Reserve ] Hacking Elections ] Iraq War ] Fake War on Terror ] New World Order ] Media ] Peak Oil-Petro Euros ] Fascism in U.S. ] Editorials ] About Us ] Links ] Contact Us ]




 Big Star-Spangled Lies for War
    By Norman Solomon
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Monday 08 August 2005

    A lot of people want to believe that the current war on Iraq is some kind of aberration - a radical departure from the previous baseline of US foreign policy. That's a comforting illusion.

    Yes, the current administration in Washington is notable for the extreme mendacity and calculated idiocy of its claims. But - decade after decade - the propaganda fuel for one US war after another has flowed from a standard set of lies.

    Some of the boilerplate lies are implicit assumptions about Uncle Sam's benign and even noble intent. Other deceptions rely on more specific whoppers endlessly whirling through the news media's spin cycle. From one war to the next, certain themes are played up more than others - but the process always involves building an agenda to start a war, trying to justify the war while it's under way, and then claiming that the war must continue as long as the man in the Oval Office says so.

    Sometimes a war begins suddenly, filling the national horizon with a huge insistent flash. At other times, over a period of months or years, a low distant rumble gradually turns into a roar. But in any event, the democratic role of citizens is not simply to observe and obey. In the United States , what we think is supposed to matter. And for practical reasons, top officials in Washington don't want to seem too far out of step with voters.

    The president leads a siege of public opinion on the home front - a battleground where media spin is the main weapon. A media campaign for hearts and minds at home means going all-out to persuade us that the latest war is as good as a war can be - necessary, justified, righteous and worth any sorrows to be left in its wake.

    Along the way, media outlets routinely march to the drumbeat of key themes:

                                 America Is a Fair and Noble Superpower

                                 Our Leaders Will Do Everything They Can to Avoid War

                                 Our Leaders Would Never Tell Us Outright Lies

                                 This Guy Is a Modern-Day Hitler

                                 This Is about Human Rights

                                 This Is Not at All about Oil or Corporate Profits

                                 They Are the Aggressors, Not Us

                                 If This War Is Wrong, Congress Will Stop It

                                 If This War Is Wrong, the Media Will Tell Us

                                 Media Coverage Brings War into Our Living Rooms

                                 Opposing the War Means Siding with the Enemy

                                 This Is a Necessary Battle in the War on Terrorism

                                 What the US Government Needs Most Is Better PR

                                 The Pentagon Fights Wars as Humanely as Possible

                                 Our Soldiers Are Heroes, Theirs Are Inhuman

                                 America Needs the Resolve to Kick the " Vietnam Syndrome"

                                 Withdrawal Would Cripple US Credibility

    In a society with significant aspects of democracy, persistent spin is necessary to gain and retain public support for war. The war-makers rely on "perception management" techniques that effectively promote certain themes; the better we understand those ongoing themes, the more clearly we'll be able to see through them. Such understanding can blow away the fog of media war and enhance democratic participation in decisions that are truly matters of life and death.