The Truth will prevail, But only if we Demand it from Congress!

9-11 Inside Job and Neocons Hacked 2004

9-11 Physical Evidence

  9-11 Physical Evidence

The physical evidence does not support the official government explanation of what

happened on 9/11.However, this physical evidence and the laws of nature strongly

support an explanation of the events of 9/11 that requires that the Bush Administration

was complicit in the planning and orchestration of 9/11. The following articles

and links to streaming videos clearly support this contention.


15 Minute Talk about the Attacks on the World Trade Center

Joe talks about the evidence that clearly supports the "Conspiracy

Theory" that the World Trade Center Towers and World Trade

Center 7 Building were destroyed by controlled demolitions.



Loose Change-2nd Edition

(Title is Link to Streaming Video)



Newly Released 9-11 Video Exposes U.S. Government’s


Well Planned “False Flag” Attack


The Destruction of the World Trade Center:
Why the Official Account Cannot Be True

David Ray Griffin

Authorized Version (with references & notes)


Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?

The views in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author

(not Brigham Young University).

By Steven E. Jones

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Brigham Young University

Provo, UT 84604

In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis

that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage

and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned explosives.  I consider the

official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus damage

alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings.  And I present evidence

for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data,

testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded

by the US government.


Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC

By Elaine Jarvik
Deseret Morning News

      The physics of 9/11 — including how fast and symmetrically one of the

World Trade Center buildings fell — prove that official explanations of the

collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics professor.
      In fact, it's likely that there were "pre-positioned explosives" in all three

buildings at ground zero, says Steven E. Jones.
      In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed publication

next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors

of the Web site, whose research Jones quotes.


Griffin Seals Case for 9/11 WTC Demolition

Dr. Kevin Barrett, University of Wisconsin

Calls on NY Times to End Coverup

In two speeches to overflow crowds in New York last weekend, notable 

theologian David Ray Griffin argued that recently revealed evidence seals 

the case that the Twin Towers and WTC-7 were destroyed by controlled 

demolition with explosives. Despite the many enduring mysteries of the 

9/11 attacks, Dr. Griffin concluded, "It is already possible to know, beyond 

a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World  

Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists

within our own government."


Transcript of David Ray Griffin Talk on C-Span

Posted May 10, 2005

This lecture was delivered at the University of Wisconsin at Madison on

April 18, 2005, and first broadcast by C-Span2 (BookTV) on April 30.

Although this text does not correspond exactly to the lecture as

orally delivered, all the differences are trivial except that, of course, the

oral presentation had to get along without footnotes.
- David Ray Griffin] 



Posted May 09, 2005

We firmly believe that those people who fully believe the conclusions of the

Kean Commission have never seen or heard any of the compelling evidence

to the contrary. These people never permit the complete picture to be

painted for them. - They never allow themselves a chance to look at any of

the information about 9/11 that has been revealed.  They simply do not want

to know that it exists.


David Ray Griffin C-Span Talk on Bush Involvement in 9-11

Posted May 2, 2005


Talk by David Ray Griffin, Professor and author of The New Pearl Harbor,

about 9-11 Lies

Must See Video!!!


Interview of David Ray Griffin, Author of The New Pearl Harbor 12-27-04



Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11

By David Ray Griffin 

Vancouver Indymedia

Posted May 1, 2005

Summary of his book, The New Pearl Harbor. 


Mock Trial of Bush Administration for Orchestrating 9/11 Attack

       Very well done, informative streaming video showing clearly that the

       official story is not true.









“Loose Change” Video

This is a clip from the documentary Loose Change, which features firefighters and 

other eyewitnesses discussing explosions at the World Trade Center and

examines the physical evidence.

What If:

The twin towers were not hit by commercial airliners?

The World Trade Center was not brought down by jet fuel?

The Pentagon was not hit by a 757?

There is no trace of flight 93 in Shanksville?

Conspiracy theory?  It's not a theory if you can prove.

Go to  if you wish to buy this video and for much more 

information about the lies and cover-up of the Bush administration regarding 9/11.



“9-11 Illusion” Video by George Humphrey

Posted July 2, 2005


This important film will help open your friends' and family's eyes to the great 

illusion that the mainstream media has created around the September 11th attacks. 

The narrative of facts reinforced by visual evidence, poignant images and original 

music will compel the viewer to leave the old explanation behind and move toward 

a greater awareness of the New World Order.

"This is one of the best 9/11 films I've ever seen. It covers the broad spectrum of 

facts exposing the globalists' orchestration of 9/11." -- Alex Jones


9-11: The Great Illusion

By George Humphrey




"The whole world saw it. Those jets flew into the skyscrapers, there were enormous

explosions and the fires brought the buildings down. We all saw it with our own eyes,

everybody knows it!"However, there is more to this story than meets the eye especially

the eye that has been exposed to the filter of corporate television.


The Pentagon is one of the largest office buildings in the world and houses The

Department of Defense.There are more cameras and surveillance equipment

around the Washington D.C. area than any place in the world, so when the military

releases only two pictures of the attack that don't even show the attacking plane, then . . .


The World Trade Center Demolition
   and the So-Called War on Terrorism

This web site contains streaming videos and photos which clearly shows that this building 

was destroyed by a controlled demolition.



WTC Building 7 Website

    This web site contains a streaming video which clearly shows that this building was 

destroyed by a controlled demolition.

    The unexplained collapse of Building 7 is the tip of the iceberg
    of unexplored issues of the September 11th attack.
9-11Research examines those broader issues.


Physics 911

The Precautionary Principle
By George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)

Posted April 27, 2005

The precautionary principle is based on the fact that the failure to prove
a proposition completely does not disprove the proposition. If the
proposition warns of an ongoing or oncoming disaster (e.g. global warming)
it is wise to take precautions.
The proposition arrived at here is this:

the 911 hijackings and damage to buildings were not the work of Arab

terrorists, but appear to have been part of a black operation carried out 

with the cooperation of elements in our government.



Calculations on the Possible Use of Thermite
to Melt Sections of the WTC Core Columnsby D. P. Grimmer

Version 1.1, June 20th 2004


Anomalies involving the collapse of WTC buildings on 9-11 are discussed

from the perspective of possible controlled demolition implosion rather

than of aircraft impact and fuel-fire damage. Considered is the possible

use of thermite to melt sections of the columns of the WTC towers inner

cores, thus aiding in their collapse. This paper will discuss the structure

of the WTC core columns, and estimate the mass of metal to be melted;

calculate the sensible and latent heat energy needed for melting this mass;

discuss the nature and specific energies of the thermite reaction; estimate

the mass and volume of thermite necessary to provide the energies for melting;

and discuss the possible locations where such thermite could be placed to

cause melting, both internal and external to a core column.


High Ranking Army Officer Claims Missile Used at Pentagon

Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 

Indicate Depleted Uranium Used; High-Ranking Army Officer Claims Missile 

Used at Pentagon, Not Commercial Airliner

Two high profile radiation experts concur Pentagon strike involved use of a 

missile. Also Geiger counter readings right after the attack shows high levels 

of radiation 12 miles away from Pentagon crash site.


Core 9-11 Evidence-from

This is a simple but powerful summary of the evidence 

that clearly points to the government official story being 

an outright lie.



By John Daly
UPI International Correspondent
Washington, DC, Jun. 13 (UPI)

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing
serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11
. Former
chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W.
Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the
collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled
demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.


Media Big Shots at NBC and New York Times 'Hush Hush And


About Why WTC Janitor Story Never Appeared, A Story That Blows The 

Official 9/11Account Sky High

Although 14 eye witnesses verify WTC janitor's story about a massive basement 

explosion just seconds before the airline strike of the north tower, major media 

reps. refuse to discuss why the story never ran or claim the story provided nothing 

new, wasn't important or wasn't the focus of their attention.

July 8, 2005

By Greg Szymanski

The media big shots, like a gang of school yard bullies taping shut a little guy’s mouth, 

have placed a big, black curtain around the 9/11 story of WTC janitor William Rodriguez, 

silencing him as if he screwed up their fictitious plot in a television script already written.



Second WTC Janitor Comes Forward With Eye-Witness Testimony 

Of 'Bomb-Like' Explosion in North Tower Basement

Jose Sanchez, while working in a sub-level 4 workshop of the north 

tower on 9/11, heard a bomb-like explosion, had his hair burned and 

rescued a co-worker who had his leg and knee broken from the basement 

blast taking place at the same time the jetliner struck the top floors.

July 12, 2005

By Greg Szymanski

A second WTC maintenance worker has now come forward with eye-witness testimony 

that a massive explosion erupted in the lower levels of the north tower at approximately 

the same time the jetliner struck the tower’s top floors.



9/11: Missing Black Boxes in World Trade Center Attacks Found

by Firefighters, Analyzed by NTSB, Concealed by FBI

Did the Bush Administration Lie to Congress and the 9/11 Commission?


One of the more puzzling mysteries of 9-11 is what ever happened to the flight recorders

of the two planes that hit the World Trade Center towers. Now it appears that they may

not be missing at all.

Counterpunch has learned that the FBI has them.


The strange case of the 9/11 cell phone calls

Last month, Qualcomm Corporation issued a press release stating that they

had developed a new technology that would finally make it possible to make

cellular phone calls from commercial airliners. Using a technology called "Pico Cells",

the system will work as a link between the airliner and ground towers. According to

the press release, it is currently impossible to connect by cell phone in a plane that

is above 4,000 feet.



This article tries to answer one question:

Are you crazy to say that a large passenger plane

- such as a Boeing 757 -  flew in here?

Posted May 2, 2005


  CNN Live 9/11 Broadcast in Front of Pentagon

       No sign of airplane wreckage anywhere.

Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? - A 727 JT8D

        They are all jet engine components (past and present) on the A-3 Skywarrior 

twin-turbojet airplane and on older versions of the 737. The USAF only has a few 

of the A-3s left in operation and what was formerly Hughes Aircraft, now Raytheon,

has a fleet of them at Van Nuys , Calif. This type of turbojet engine has never been 

used on a Boeing 757, so the debate on "type of plane" can end there.


The Pentagon Flight

This site attempts to explain why Fl 77 had to be shot down.


Hunt the Boeing

Did you find the Boeing? Can you still defend the official version of events?


Attack on the Pentagon-Show Us the Boeing

by Victor Thorn

     If a Boeing 757 really did hit the Pentagon, and the Bush administration wants

everybody to be 100% assured that it did, why don’t they do two simple things...


A Comparison of actual and expected wing debris resulting 

from the impact of  a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building.

A common sense look at the debris evidence found at the 

Pentagon clearly shows that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.